Authors should show how the results of their calculations relate to the main experimental objectives of the paper. In the experiemental section of the paper, the authors should provide the following details, which should be appropriately referenced. In addition, authors must retain the actual input and output files so that they can be made available to referees if requested. When the details of the calculations are given as Electronic Supplementary Information, the details of the methodology should be expanded.
Papers should only be submitted for consideration once consent is given by all contributing authors. Those submitting papers should carefully check that all those whose work contributed to the paper are acknowledged as contributing authors. The list of authors should include all those who can legitimately claim authorship. This is all those who:. Authors should meet the conditions of all of the points above.
When a large, multicentre group has conducted the work, the group should identify the individuals who accept direct responsibility for the manuscript. These individuals should fully meet the criteria for authorship. Acquisition of funding, collection of data, or general supervision of the research group alone does not constitute authorship, although all contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in the Acknowledgments section. All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an Acknowledgements section.
Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help, or a department chair who provided only general support. Any acknowledgements should appear first at the end of your article prior to your Declaration of Conflicting Interests if applicable , any notes and your References. Individuals who provided writing assistance, e. It is not necessary to disclose use of language polishing services. Journal of Chemical Research requires all authors to acknowledge their funding in a consistent fashion under a separate heading.
Please visit the Funding Acknowledgements page on the SAGE Journal Author Gateway to confirm the format of the acknowledgment text in the event of funding, or state that: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. It is the policy of Journal of Chemical Research to require a declaration of conflicting interests from all authors enabling a statement to be carried within the paginated pages of all published articles.
Medical research involving human subjects must be conducted according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Please ensure that you have provided the full name and institution of the review committee, in addition to the approval number. For research articles, authors are also required to state in the methods section whether participants provided informed consent and whether the consent was written or verbal.
Information on informed consent to report individual cases or case series should be included in the manuscript text. A statement is required regarding whether written informed consent for patient information and images to be published was provided by the patient s or a legally authorized representative. The confirmatory letter may be uploaded with your submission as a separate file. The trial registry name and URL, and registration number must be included at the end of the abstract. At SAGE we are committed to facilitating openness, transparency and reproducibility of research.
Where relevant, Journal of Chemical Research encourages authors to share their research data in a suitable public repository subject to ethical considerations and where data is included, to add a data accessibility statement in their manuscript file. Authors should also follow data citation principles. SAGE is committed to upholding the integrity of the academic record. Journal of Chemical Research and SAGE take issues of copyright infringement, plagiarism or other breaches of best practice in publication very seriously.
We seek to protect the rights of our authors and we always investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published articles.
Equally, we seek to protect the reputation of the journal against malpractice. Submitted articles may be checked with duplication-checking software. If material has been previously published it is not generally acceptable for publication in a SAGE journal. However, there are certain circumstances where previously published material can be considered for publication. Exceptions may exist where an assignment of copyright is required or preferred by a proprietor other than SAGE.
BMC Chemistry | Home page
In this case copyright in the work will be assigned from the author to the society. The preferred format for your manuscript is Word. LaTeX files are also accepted. Figures supplied in colour will appear in colour online and in the print issue. There is no charge for reproducing figures in colour in the printed version. This journal is able to host additional materials online e. For more information please refer to our guidelines on submitting supplemental files.
If you have reviewed or authored for the journal in the past year it is likely that you will have had an account created. For further guidance on submitting your manuscript online please visit ScholarOne Online Help. ORCID provides a unique and persistent digital identifier that distinguishes researchers from every other researcher, even those who share the same name, and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between researchers and their professional activities, ensuring that their work is recognized.
It takes seconds to do: click the link when prompted, sign into your ORCID account and our systems are automatically updated. Regardless, this disconnect between peer judgements of impact and citations for individual articles seems worthy of further exploration. We evaluate how individual judgements, based upon different types of significance, relate to commonly-used citation-based metrics as well as other metrics. By doing so we show that researchers do have nuanced and measurable concepts of importance and significance in an attempt to understand how research and researchers might be evaluated when citation counts are not available or relevant.
In effect, researchers are able to see different types of significance in an individual research article.
- use of force international law essay.
- write a narrative essay on my most memorable day.
- queen elizabeth i essay?
With the goal of testing the ability of chemists to evaluate research importance in mind, we chose an issue from the Journal of the American Chemical Society volume: , issue: 31 , published in , 10 years prior to the survey date. This particular journal and issue was chosen to expose survey participants to articles in a wide variety of chemistry subdisciplines and topics from a flagship journal while controlling for journal-level impact, and to have allowed sufficient time for the articles to accumulate citations.
We realize that there are a number of journals from which we could have chosen. A survey instrument was developed and tested via personal correspondence with 25 chemists. Upon analysis of this initial data, noting the inability of professional chemists to correctly choose the 3 top cited articles, we decided to expand our efforts to include more respondents.
This survey was then replicated via SurveyMonkey. The survey consisted of 8 questions, including basic demographic information such as research subdiscipline s and age. The following four questions were then applied to the same 63 articles from the JACS issue:.
- Chemical Papers.
- the house of bernarda alba + essays.
- Benefit from our free funding service.
- aids cause effect essay;
- thesis advertising tumblr;
- roman empire thesis statement;
In total, people responded to the survey over a 2-week period. Removal of participants resulted in participant responses included in our calculations. Article citation counts for each article were recorded in November of and November of from Web of Science.
H-index metrics of all corresponding authors were recorded in January of from Web of Science, and the highest h-index for each paper was used. Mendeley metrics were recorded from Mendeley in November of The data set, available online via Figshare, was analyzed using Microsoft Excel [ 11 ].
- Latest Articles.
- theory thesis difference.
- essays on emotion for sixth grader.
- Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research | JOCPR.
- fun creative writing exercises high school.
- short essay questions for to kill a mockingbird.
Our survey design and execution contain three main limitations. One, the participants in the survey were self-selected from those that are active within online chemistry communication channels, and are only a small subset of the entire field of chemistry. As such, they are not necessarily an accurate representation of the entire field, but their basic demographics are noted below. The second limitation is in the design of the survey itself—namely, that the four central questions were not order randomized. As a result, it is entirely possible that one question influenced the next.
As shown in the results, most respondents chose different articles for the four questions, but the possible effects of this influence are unknown and unaccounted for. A third limitation is the open, rather than blind, manner in which the subdisciplines for each article were assigned through an evaluation by the authors of this paper. We stress to the reader that this survey and study are designed to serve as preliminary analyses designed to illustrate and quantify abstract ideas in a new and interesting way. We invite bibliometricians and other researchers to more deeply delve into our data to examine additional trends not included in our study, including how self-citations may affect differences in total citations and perceived importance.
Table 1 lists the self-reported demographics of the respondents, who were able to select multiple subdisciplines to accurately and fully describe their training and current duties. The demographics of our respondents were weighted more heavily towards organic and medicinal chemistry than the general membership of the American Chemical Society [ 12 ]. Nevertheless, we were able to attract respondents whose self-associated subdisciplines come from across the full spectrum of chemistry.
Each respondent was asked to choose 3 papers for each question. In looking at the papers that were selected, the highest correlation between the sets of answers was found for papers that were deemed significant and those that were thought to be the highest cited. Correlations among these categories are shown in Table 2. The correlation between papers deemed significant and those that should be shared with other chemists was higher than the correlation between those that were thought to be the most cited and those that should be shared with other chemists.
This result seems to indicate that while chemists do equate significance with citations, the act of sharing papers with other chemists should also be tracked in more detail.
Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research (ISSN : 0975-7384)
The relationship between sharing with chemists and citations as well as between sharing with chemists and significance is certainly an interesting one. There may be certain papers which chemists find to be significant that might not be expected to show up in citation counts. Prior research focusing on the correlation between scientists storing and sharing papers specifically through Mendeley reference libraries or over social media and citation rate has shown that sharing can be predictive of future citations [ 14 , 15 ].
Related chemical research paper
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved